Pennsylvania HB2653: Scope of Practice
Official title[PA] HB2653: Providing for behavioral health care provider access; and imposing penalties.
Pennsylvania · committee · Relevance score 78 of 100 (major policy shift). high impact.
This summary is informational and is not legal advice. Read the source text before acting on it.
What this policy change does.
- Jurisdiction
- Pennsylvania
- Stage
- committee
- Bill
- HB2653
- Published
- June 24, 2026
- Impact score
- 78 of 100, from analysis of the full text: major policy shift
- Primary source
- LegiScan
Impact on your practice
If passed, HB2653 could strengthen Pennsylvania therapists' ability to gain insurance network access and ensure payers honor provider selection. Penalty structure suggests meaningful enforcement mechanism. High-value item for solo practitioners and smaller agencies fighting network discrimination.
Key facts
- Pennsylvania HB2653 focuses on behavioral health care provider access and compliance penalties
- Language suggests insurance network access and/or referral requirement reform
- Includes penalty provisions for non-compliance
- Currently re-committed to Rules Committee—likely procedural move before floor vote
States and jurisdictions where it applies.
- Pennsylvania
Read the original policy source.
Primary source text, linked directly.
https://legiscan.com/PA/bill/HB2653/2025
- Analysis by
- Therapy Companion policy engine
- Confidence
- medium
- Analyzed
- July 28, 2026
Related policy changes.
- Relevance score92 / 100
APA applauds new state laws allowing psychologists with advanced training to prescribe certain medications in Hawaii and Vermont
While this directly benefits psychologists seeking prescriptive authority, it's highly relevant to therapists in these states as it reshapes the competitive landscape and collaborative care models. Therapists should understand how this affects referral patterns, co-treatment arrangements, and potential billing implications for collaborative care.high impact - Relevance score78 / 100
APA concerned about far-reaching consequences from Supreme Court decision regarding therapy as ‘free speech’
This Supreme Court decision poses a serious risk to the regulatory foundation of mental health licensing. If therapy is constitutionally protected speech, it could weaken licensing boards' enforcement power, create litigation exposure for disciplinary actions, and blur the line between protected speech and professional misconduct. Therapists should monitor ongoing litigation and regulatory responses.high impact - Relevance score78 / 100
C.A.R.E. for Mental Health Professionals Act
Potential scope expansion or improved insurance recognition/reimbursement for mental health professionals, but bill title is abbreviated and full text is needed to assess true impact. Could address provider discrimination or network inclusion barriers.medium impact - Relevance score75 / 100
[PA] HB668: Authorizing the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to join the Counseling Compact; and providing for the form of the compact.
HB668 stalled, but its companion SB604 passed, meaning Pennsylvania LPCs will soon gain interstate practice portability through the Counseling Compact. This removes licensing barriers for therapists seeking to practice across state lines.high impact
Track what affects your practice.
Therapy Companion tracks both: the policy shifts on this page and the denial patterns hitting your claims.